Researchers from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health and College of Veterinary Medicine are publishing a series of articles in PLOS ONE comparing the various air samplers used to detect airborne viruses such as influenza. This first publication, available in open access, focuses on impingers and cyclones.
Highlights
- Higher quantities of virus were recovered by high flow rate samplers
- Lower flow rate samplers performed better when virus concentrations were high
- Based on the question of interest, a different air sampler might be more efficient.